Shady’s Bach
Big ideaAquinas’s cosmological arguments rapped as an Eminem parody — “will the real First Mover please stand up?” Motion, causation, contingency, and degrees of perfection all point past themselves to one uncaused, necessary, maximal Being: we call Him God.
Will the real First Mover please stand up?
I said, will the real First Mover please stand up?
Atheists gonna have a problem in here.
I’m coming at you via a classical lane:
four ways to see why there’s a God via logic that makes it plain.
I’m locking in the First Way, listen to the motion sway —
everything moves ’cause a mover pushed it into play.
Nothing moves itself, nah, that’s a logical health hazard,
check the physics, nothing is its own master.
But hold up, wait a minute, look at the chain:
you can’t have an infinite regress inside of the brain.
No infinite chain of movers causing the spin,
you need a spot where the motion has gotta begin.
Unmoved itself, initiating the pace —
that’s the First Mover, God, the uncaused cause of space.
Switch gears, Second Way, efficient causality:
every effect has a cause in this reality.
Nothing causes itself, that’s a logical crime —
you’d have to exist before your own start time.
Can’t be an infinite list of the causes in line,
or the first cause is gone, and the others decline.
So we strip it back, attack the track, no flaw:
there must be a First Cause, uncaused, raw.
Source of all causation, the boss of the station —
God is the name of this foundation.
Third Way, check the mic, is it on? Possibility.
Things in the world got a contingency liability,
meaning they might not exist, yeah, they contingent —
here today, gone tomorrow, survival is stringent.
If everything was contingent, snap, back to the past,
there’d be a time when nothing existed, nothing would last.
And if nothing was there, then nothing would be here right now —
but we exist, so wipe the sweat off your brow.
There must be a Necessary Being, not a “maybe” or “might,”
whose existence is essential, burning ever so bright.
Sustaining the contingent, keeping atoms in check —
Necessary Being is God, put respect on the deck.
Fourth Way, Shady’s Bach is back, degrees of the best:
we see the good, true, and beautiful put to the test.
Varying degrees implies a standard, a height —
a maximum perfection shining blindingly bright.
Most good, most true, the cause of the quality,
Maximum Being, defining the morality.
Source of all perfections, the standard, the rod —
that maximum being?
We call Him God.
We call Him God.
We call Him God.
Yeah. Metaphysical nature, not just faith in the dark —
observations of the world leaving a logical mark.
C.P.E. Bach, fade it out. Thomas Aquinas. Summa Theologica. I’m out.
Scripture References
- Romans 1:20
- Acts 17:24-28
- Exodus 3:14
- Hebrews 1:3
Study this song
Teaching aids drawn from the song — for personal study or group discussion.
How the song moves
Key terms & allusions
- Aquinas’s Five Ways — Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274), in the Summa Theologica, offered five logical arguments for God’s existence; the song raps four — motion, causation, contingency, and degrees of perfection.
- “will the real First Mover please stand up?” — A parody of Eminem’s “The Real Slim Shady” (“will the real Slim Shady please stand up?”), with the album title punning on Slim Shady + Bach.
- the Unmoved Mover — The First Way’s conclusion (and Aristotle’s term): the source of all motion that is not itself moved.
- the Necessary Being — The Third Way: a being whose existence is essential, not contingent — sustaining everything that “might not exist.” It echoes God’s self-naming “I AM” (Exodus 3:14).
- Maximum Being / summum bonum — The Fourth Way: degrees of perfection imply a maximum, the cause of all goodness, truth, and beauty — “the Father of lights” (James 1:17).
Discussion questions
- Aquinas argues from the world (motion, cause, contingency) up to God. How do these “from creation” arguments complement faith in Scripture?
- The song ends “metaphysical nature, not just faith in the dark.” Fair balance, or does it overstate what reason can prove?
- Which of the four “ways” do you find most compelling, and why?
For contemplation
- When you trace any chain — of motion, cause, or being — back far enough, do you arrive at God?
- “We call Him God.” Is the God of the arguments the God you actually worship?
- Where do you need “logic that makes it plain” to steady a wavering faith?